The Board of Commissioners of the National Elections Commission (NEC), has showed and affirmed the ruling of its Chief Dispute Hearing Officer in the Complain case of the Rainbow Alliance (RA), in relation to the withdrawal case of 2 of its individuals.

However, attorneys representing the complainants, led by means of Cllr. Emmanuel A. Turay has accredited the ruling and introduced an attraction to the Supreme Court of Liberia.

The Rainbow Alliance complains that two of its individuals, the Union of Liberian Democrats (ULD), and Redemption Democratic Congress (RDC) didn’t absolutely agree to the Alliance 3 steps procedures for withdrawal.

However, the NEC Board in its ruling on Wednesday, cited segment 2.3 of the Rainbow Alliance Framework report as reliance for its ultimate ruling for denial.

Section 2.3 of the Rainbow Alliance report states, {that a} represent birthday celebration wishing to withdraw will have to have a solution signed by means of two thirds of government individuals, seen a ready length of 90 days and pay, if any, all monetary arrears to the alliance.

The NEC ruling stated, the Rainbow Alliance Framework which is above the Rainbow Alliance Plan Document does no longer require a member to apply the 3 steps procedures for withdrawal nor does it supplies any penalty for a member who withdraws from the Alliance.

The ruling of the NEC Board learn on Wednesday, 21 December 2022 by means of the Clarke of the Administrative Court, came upon that the Chief Dispute Hearing Officer, Cllr. Muana Ville was once proper to disclaim the appellant’s attraction on grounds that NEC does no longer have the authority to the ask the (ULD), and (RDC) to pay dues.

The Chief Dispute Hearing Officer of NEC came upon all through the listening to that the 2 events wrote a letter in March of 2022 to government of the Rainbow Alliance, asking for to withdraw from the Alliance and due to this fact signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), with the Congress for Democratic Change, (CDC).

The defendants had been represented in courtroom by means of Atty. S. Patterson Blomo, whilst the complainants had been represented by means of Cllr. Emmanuel A. Turay.

Author: New Dawn

Source link