An Accra High Court, Land Division the day past ordered Dr Afare Apeadu Donkor, former Ghana Ambassador to China and one Ishak Mutawakil to keep off a assets that has develop into a topic of prison struggle between the 2 other folks.
Dr Donkor and Mr Mutawakli, each defendants within the case in addition to their assigns had been ordered to keep away totally from the valuables positioned at Roman Ridge pending the submitting of the Application and resolution of similar by means of their legal professionals inside of 14 days.
Prior to the injunction positioned at the two and their assigns, the Airport Police had stepped in to save you what can have develop into a deadly assault on citizens of the valuables who had been positioned there by means of the plaintiff within the case, Professor Emmanuel Kwame Anatsui.
(*2*)
The legal professionals for the defendants, Paul Dzadey, Nana Agyei Baffour Awuah and Perella Bruce of their submissions in court docket prayed towards the injunction.
But the legal professionals for the plaintiff led by means of Alexander Afenyo-Markin then again argued that the present occupants have been attacked in recent years by means of individuals believed to be assigns of the defendants.
Mr Afenyo-Markin produced reveals in court docket to turn out that the present occupants had been attacked by means of males on motorbikes sporting offensive guns and, due to this fact, a restraining order towards them was once vital which the court docket granted.
The plaintiff, within the remark of declare, mentioned he approached the first Defendant for the acquisition of the valuables and that exams printed that the mentioned assets was once on state land which was once leased to Blackwood Hodge (Gold Coast Limited) for a time period of 75 years who therefore assigned similar to the first Defendant in a deed dated November 16, 1992.
However, additional due diligence unearthed that the first Defendant in a deed dated June 15, 2010 had offered and assigned its pursuits together with rights and responsibilities to UT FINANCIAL SERVICES thereby extinguishing all pursuits of the first defendant to the mentioned Property.
Plaintiff avers that UT Financial Services in a deed dated April 18, 2011 assigned all its hobby together with its rights and responsibilities within the mentioned assets to him after the fee of $750,000 receipt, which UT Financial Services duly stated.
According to the Plaintiff, the first Defendant had on the time no longer bought the needful has the same opinion and subdivision approval from Lands Commission in favour of UT Financial Services, he agreed to download the needful has the same opinion in favour of the Plaintiff and the price of the consent to be shared between the Plaintiff and the first Defendant.
The Plaintiff defined that he persevered to revel in non violent profession of the valuables till September 27, 2021 when the first Defendant via his legal professional sought to evict him from the mentioned assets declaring that he had exercised the choice to renew beneath the top rent even if he had assigned all his pursuits within the mentioned land together with rights and responsibilities to UT Financial Services (UT Bank Limited) who had therefore assigned its hobby to the Plaintiff.
Author: Ghanaian Times
Source link